http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/local/2014/11/05/rockwall-logan-hunt-adoption-homeless/18564243/
Showing posts with label older children. Show all posts
Showing posts with label older children. Show all posts
Thursday, November 6, 2014
Saturday, January 19, 2013
What is a baby?
Why are so many children waiting year after year in foster care, orphanages and institutions around the world? Why, when so many childless couples wait year after year, too, spending tens of thousands of dollars on infertility treatments, surrogacy arrangements, and infant adoptions?
Of course, the answer is that parents want, first of all, a child who is like them, and of them. Genetically related. THEIR KID. If not, let it be an infant, so the experience will at least approximate a biological child arriving. THEIR EXPERIENCE. All about THEM.
What about the kid? Does a child come into the world for the benefit of the parents, or are the parents there for the benefit of the child? A secular worldview tries to collapse these perspectives onto each other: Having the child is the parents' choice, but having made the choice, the parents have the responsibility to provide the child's needs to maturity. This worldview allows for great license for amateur eugenics, as parents select bio-parents from sperm-banks or surrogacy registries, or selectively abort fetuses of the wrong gender, or with inconvenient abnormalities. How does one "flip the switch" from thinking of the child as a product to be procured to specifications, to accepting the child for who he/she is, with all the vicissitudes of a normal childhood and adolescence?
A religious worldview can sometimes bypass this, by recognizing all children as "gifts" from G*d. We do not pick and choose our gifts. We do not return a gift that has been specially ordered and personalized for us. We do not discard gifts that have been given to us by those whom we love and esteem. If such a gift is bestowed upon us and requires care and nurturing, we will do all in our power to prove ourselves worthy of it.
In the second blessing after the Shema, we read,
I am currently watching two adoption stories unfold, featuring older children with Down syndrome and severe institutionalized effects. Both families are large families which have adopted before. Both families see these children, long rejected by conventional adopters, as precious gifts every bit as uniquely bestowed upon them as the children they have conceived and birthed themselves.
Here are the Mussers, who have just completed their first trip to adopt 15-year-old Tommy, who is scheduled to come home in April/May. They have nine biological children, ranging in age from 2 to 18. Their youngest was born with Down syndrome. Just over a year ago they rescued their daughter Katie from the Pleven orphanage. At almost 10 years old, she weighed barely 10 lbs. The story of her recovery and blossoming in the past year is nothing short of miraculous.
Here are the Salems, who are presently in the final stages of bringing home 14-year-old Hasya and 9-year-old Kael, both of whom have Down syndrome. Like Katie and Tommy, these children have suffered horribly, not because of their disabilities per se, but because of how their disabilities are seen by a society that views children as valuable only if they meet its specifications. Both are tiny for their ages, and severely delayed. Hasya, like Katie before her, has not been permitted to grow beyond the size of a young infant. She is currently struggling to gain nutrition without succumbing to refeeding syndrome. Kael, who was in a different institution, is doing much better, though he is still only the size of an average 3-year-old.
These and other families are taking on the children whom they recognize as "the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself", who welcome the children to come through them though they are not of them.
What is a baby? A baby is a human being coming to the world, and meeting his/her family for the first time. In reading various people's adoption stories, I am repeatedly struck by the idea that a child coming into a family - at whatever age - is in many ways like a newborn. They may or may not be walking, talking, or toileting yet, but emotionally they are at square one. Many families report very good results by "regressing" their new child, so that s/he can cover the lost emotional ground. Katie, a year later, is in many ways comparable to a one-year-old. In some ways she is way ahead of a one-year-old! She has grown to the size of a 3 or 4-year-old, she is learning to toilet herself, and so on.
Russia is not likely to approve any new adoptions at this point, although it is hoped that the proposed amendment to make an exception for special needs will be passed speedily. However, many older children are waiting in Ukraine, Bulgaria, China, and many other countries, in conditions just as deplorable as Pleven. U.S. foster care provides for over 100,000 children each year, most of whom have no disability except their age, in conditions which are incomparably better. These children go to school, receive full medical care, and enjoy a semblance of family life. Yet emotionally, they need parents who will baby them, make up the lost time, and allow them to reach their true potential.
Why, then, do they wait? These gifts, these babies frozen in time? A newborn baby is no less a bundle of needs than a child scarred by loss and neglect.
One of the prayers of Yom Kippur calls upon us to see ourselves as raw material in G*d's hands, to be fashioned into a work of art through the process of repentance and good deeds. Khalil Gibran once again echoes Jewish liturgy when he writes:
Of course, the answer is that parents want, first of all, a child who is like them, and of them. Genetically related. THEIR KID. If not, let it be an infant, so the experience will at least approximate a biological child arriving. THEIR EXPERIENCE. All about THEM.
What about the kid? Does a child come into the world for the benefit of the parents, or are the parents there for the benefit of the child? A secular worldview tries to collapse these perspectives onto each other: Having the child is the parents' choice, but having made the choice, the parents have the responsibility to provide the child's needs to maturity. This worldview allows for great license for amateur eugenics, as parents select bio-parents from sperm-banks or surrogacy registries, or selectively abort fetuses of the wrong gender, or with inconvenient abnormalities. How does one "flip the switch" from thinking of the child as a product to be procured to specifications, to accepting the child for who he/she is, with all the vicissitudes of a normal childhood and adolescence?
A religious worldview can sometimes bypass this, by recognizing all children as "gifts" from G*d. We do not pick and choose our gifts. We do not return a gift that has been specially ordered and personalized for us. We do not discard gifts that have been given to us by those whom we love and esteem. If such a gift is bestowed upon us and requires care and nurturing, we will do all in our power to prove ourselves worthy of it.
In the second blessing after the Shema, we read,
And you shall inscribe them on the doorposts of your house and on your gates - so that your days and the days of your children may be prolonged on the land which the L-rd swore to your fathers to give to them for as long as the heavens are above the earth.I love that the inheritance is passed from our fathers to our children. We have the responsibility to maintain for our children that which we might be tempted to dispose of ourselves. This is echoed in Khalil Gibran's famous poem:
Your children are not your children.What, then, of all those waiting children? The older children, the sibling groups, the children with physical and developmental disabilities, with delays, with chronic medical conditions? Whose gifts are they?
They are the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself.
They come through you but not from you,
And though they are with you, yet they belong not to you.
I am currently watching two adoption stories unfold, featuring older children with Down syndrome and severe institutionalized effects. Both families are large families which have adopted before. Both families see these children, long rejected by conventional adopters, as precious gifts every bit as uniquely bestowed upon them as the children they have conceived and birthed themselves.
Here are the Mussers, who have just completed their first trip to adopt 15-year-old Tommy, who is scheduled to come home in April/May. They have nine biological children, ranging in age from 2 to 18. Their youngest was born with Down syndrome. Just over a year ago they rescued their daughter Katie from the Pleven orphanage. At almost 10 years old, she weighed barely 10 lbs. The story of her recovery and blossoming in the past year is nothing short of miraculous.
Here are the Salems, who are presently in the final stages of bringing home 14-year-old Hasya and 9-year-old Kael, both of whom have Down syndrome. Like Katie and Tommy, these children have suffered horribly, not because of their disabilities per se, but because of how their disabilities are seen by a society that views children as valuable only if they meet its specifications. Both are tiny for their ages, and severely delayed. Hasya, like Katie before her, has not been permitted to grow beyond the size of a young infant. She is currently struggling to gain nutrition without succumbing to refeeding syndrome. Kael, who was in a different institution, is doing much better, though he is still only the size of an average 3-year-old.
These and other families are taking on the children whom they recognize as "the sons and daughters of Life's longing for itself", who welcome the children to come through them though they are not of them.
What is a baby? A baby is a human being coming to the world, and meeting his/her family for the first time. In reading various people's adoption stories, I am repeatedly struck by the idea that a child coming into a family - at whatever age - is in many ways like a newborn. They may or may not be walking, talking, or toileting yet, but emotionally they are at square one. Many families report very good results by "regressing" their new child, so that s/he can cover the lost emotional ground. Katie, a year later, is in many ways comparable to a one-year-old. In some ways she is way ahead of a one-year-old! She has grown to the size of a 3 or 4-year-old, she is learning to toilet herself, and so on.
Russia is not likely to approve any new adoptions at this point, although it is hoped that the proposed amendment to make an exception for special needs will be passed speedily. However, many older children are waiting in Ukraine, Bulgaria, China, and many other countries, in conditions just as deplorable as Pleven. U.S. foster care provides for over 100,000 children each year, most of whom have no disability except their age, in conditions which are incomparably better. These children go to school, receive full medical care, and enjoy a semblance of family life. Yet emotionally, they need parents who will baby them, make up the lost time, and allow them to reach their true potential.
Why, then, do they wait? These gifts, these babies frozen in time? A newborn baby is no less a bundle of needs than a child scarred by loss and neglect.
One of the prayers of Yom Kippur calls upon us to see ourselves as raw material in G*d's hands, to be fashioned into a work of art through the process of repentance and good deeds. Khalil Gibran once again echoes Jewish liturgy when he writes:
You are the bows from which your children as living arrows are sent forth.
The archer sees the mark upon the path of the infinite, and He bends you with His might that His arrows may go swift and far.
Let your bending in the archer's hand be for gladness;
For even as he loves the arrow that flies, so He loves also the bow that is stable.
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
More about older children
There are many children out there whose main "special need" is that they are "older". No longer "cute and cuddly", but rather laden with baggage, pain and mistrust from years of loss. I want to look at 3 different 16 year old boys who had families come for them recently.
In February, Renee raised the alarm about Sam and Duncan, due to age out of the orphanage from which she adopted her daughter at the beginning of the year. Both boys had expressed an interest in being adopted by American families, apparently. Sam has only a minor disability -- a deformation of one hand. Duncan has Cerebral Palsy, and his mobility is impaired, although he is not restricted to a wheelchair. Two families stepped forward for these boys (actually there was another family, but they ran into delays getting their paperwork together). Both boys got cold feet after meeting the families, and decided to take their chances on life in Ukraine rather than take the opportunity to come to the United States, go to college, and have a piece of the American Dream. Both families went home empty-hearted and confused.
Another story started similarly. Last December, Adeye raised the alarm about Jonathan, who was aging out of a different orphanage in the same country. No special need was noted, just an older kid about to find himself out on the street. To this day I don't know why he was singled out to be advocated for. Like "Sam" and "Duncan", he hesitated about going home with the family that came for him. Like the others, he was urged by his peers and caretakers to beware of the horrors of American adoptive parents, who were likely to cut him up and sell his organs.... At the last moment, he said yes. Two months later, he (now known as Andrew) is happily integrated into his new family.
Why??? What makes the difference? How does one approach the adoption of an adolescent so as to avoid chasing a dead end?
In February, Renee raised the alarm about Sam and Duncan, due to age out of the orphanage from which she adopted her daughter at the beginning of the year. Both boys had expressed an interest in being adopted by American families, apparently. Sam has only a minor disability -- a deformation of one hand. Duncan has Cerebral Palsy, and his mobility is impaired, although he is not restricted to a wheelchair. Two families stepped forward for these boys (actually there was another family, but they ran into delays getting their paperwork together). Both boys got cold feet after meeting the families, and decided to take their chances on life in Ukraine rather than take the opportunity to come to the United States, go to college, and have a piece of the American Dream. Both families went home empty-hearted and confused.
Another story started similarly. Last December, Adeye raised the alarm about Jonathan, who was aging out of a different orphanage in the same country. No special need was noted, just an older kid about to find himself out on the street. To this day I don't know why he was singled out to be advocated for. Like "Sam" and "Duncan", he hesitated about going home with the family that came for him. Like the others, he was urged by his peers and caretakers to beware of the horrors of American adoptive parents, who were likely to cut him up and sell his organs.... At the last moment, he said yes. Two months later, he (now known as Andrew) is happily integrated into his new family.
Why??? What makes the difference? How does one approach the adoption of an adolescent so as to avoid chasing a dead end?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)